Monday, 12 August 2024

How is the Selangor State Gov going to address the problem of illegal GnG with no Planning Permission?

RAs are only interested in GnG (Gated n Guarded) ...not KRT (Kawasan Rukun Tetangga) - even though majority of residents and the general community at large prefers KRT. Why? Because they can only profit from GnG not KRT. So, how do we deal with this menace? Illegal GnGs have been sprouting all over Selangor especially in Klang, Shah Alam, Subang and P.J.

Soon, all Local Councils' procedures, practices and processes will be streamlined for a more systematic management and enforcement... by standardizing the various guidelines; legislations; checklists for application submissions; license approvals; the lodging of complaints and apps; engineering, technical and building plans; the coordination of district boundaries/local authorities; contractors and tender management; and advanced delivery systems for all stakeholders and taxpayers.

By providing a clear standard of reference for all, this will reduce any grey areas and help curb any corruption... paving the way for better planning, coordination and enforcements. At the same time this will address illegal developments with no planning permission, such as the proliferation of illegal Gated Communities in Selangor. Now there is no more excuse for the lack of enforcements.

Unscrupulous RAs operating unlawful gated community schemes that do not follow the new SGKV blueprint guidelines would be taken action immediately. Certain quarters with selfish agendas that do not respect 'the rule of law' and do not respect the community will no longer be able to do as they wish or take advantage of the residents and victimize the community.


Wednesday, 21 April 2021

Beware of informal GnG schemes by RA that are breaking the laws and asking its residents to pay

GnG scheme or scam? Let us keep formal GnG residences private and exclusive. And put a stop to informal "GnG" schemes in public property residences. Informal "GnG" schemes are actually a nuisance and a hindrance in today's society. It is worrying as these illegal schemes are sprouting everywhere all over the country.

RAs operating informal schemes have been flouting the laws and causing the communities a lot of disharmony and disunity. Certain group of people with personal agendas are just taking the golden opportunity to enrich themselves in the name of providing "neighborhood security".

No private facilities to offer and no amenities to maintain, but the RA still want to operate a GnG scheme by hiring private security guards and installing access card system which the majority of the community do not want in the first place.

RA illegally blocking public roads, using prohibited access cards and security guards asking for MyKad or driving license for identification, are some of the problems faced by the communities.

So now the question is... can security guards ask for your MyKad or Driving License for identification (even just for recording purposes)? And the other related question is, can they block public roads or stop you from entering? How about the usage of auto access card system?

There is a lot of confusion when it comes to this "GnG" subject. This lack of clarity and knowledge by the communities have been used by unscrupulous RAs to bully its non-paying residents and the surrounding communities.

When we want to talk about this subject, we need to define first whether we are referring to a formal GC scheme or an informal "GC" scheme? They are both very different and shouldn't be mixed up. There is a big difference between "formal" gated communities and "informal" gated communities...

Due to the lack of awareness by the public, corrupt RAs have been taking advantage of this grey area to coerce residents to sign up/pay for their bogus schemes that are breaking the laws.

All "Informal Gated Community" schemes that are operated by Residents Associations (RA) in non-private housing areas are not legal gated communities at all. Actually, these so-called "GnG" schemes implemented by RAs are against the laws and guidelines.

Only "Formal Gated Community" schemes that are managed by Management Corporation (MC) or Joint Management Body (JMB) are legal GnG schemes protected and bound by the Strata Title Act 1985 and the Strata Management Act 2013.

First and foremost, gaining entry into a "private property" such as a formal gated community or a stratified condominium is different from gaining entry to a "public property" such as an informal GnG residence. Both schemes are very different and people ought to know the difference.

Security guards at an "informal gated community" do not have the right to ask visitors for MyKad or driving license. It is against the law and it is an offense (Regulation 7).

In the first place they have no right to block anyone from access to any "public property" residence. It is illegal to block public roads as the roads do not belong to the RA or any particular group of residents. [Sek 80 Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (Akta 333) dan Sek 46 (1) Akta Jalan, Parit & Bangunan 1974]

The usage of auto access card system at informal GC is also prohibited and illegal.

Only licensed security guards on duty at a "formal gated community" and/ or a stratified condominium have the right to ask visitors for MyKad or driving license for identification and recording purposes. Only formal gated communities (strata or private properties) can legally block roads and implement auto access card system for their residents.

----<<<>>>----

What your RA won't tell you :-
  • That it is illegal to block public roads in residential areas (only allowed in private property /residences)
  • That it is an offense for security guards to ask for I.C. or driving license even for recording purposes only (only allowed in strata or private GC residences)
  • That auto access card system is prohibited and illegal (only legal in strata and/or formal GC residences)
  • That they have no right to stop non-participating residents or any law-abiding citizens access
  • That rightfully, they can only apply for a Guarded Neighbourhood GN scheme (classified as an Informal GC scheme)
  • That they are required to put up a Notice Board containing all relevant information (please refer below guidelines by one of the local councils)
  • If they have obtained all the necessary requirements & approvals from the relevant authorities
  • That all their security guards have license and have undergone all checks, tests and other requirements from KDN
  • How much money they are making every year from operating these schemes
  • That they have their own personal selfish agendas to fulfill and are profit driven
  • How lucrative is this industry and how easy it is for them to bs the residents
  • That many residents have dropped/opted out of the scheme along the way and they no longer have enough consensus to operate
  • That their GN scheme approval is actually on a temporary basis
  • Not only is their scheme unlawful, it is also discouraged by the government and is actually against the National Unity Blueprint
  • That there are other neighborhood watch schemes such as Rukun Tetangga, Skim Rondaan Sukarela SRS and Community Policing CP that don't cost any monthly fee at all.
  • Yes... you can guess a few more (or you can read about them from the media)

Know the differences between a formal GC scheme (GC) vs an informal GC scheme (GN):

So far, RAs in public property residences do not (or almost never) adhere to the laws and guidelines when it comes to operating their GN scheme. This is wrong as both schemes are very different. They still implement what are allowed in a GC scheme despite their application /approval is only for a GN scheme. Residents and communities have been duped into their scheme and scam.

Actually the silent majority of the communities here are fed up with unethical and corrupt practices by unscrupulous RAs operating informal GC schemes that are breaking the laws. 

If the RAs are sincere in wanting to raise and increase awareness on neighbourhood watch /security, they can also activate Komuniti Rukun Tetangga (KRT) together with Skim Rondaan Sukarela (SRS) which is supported by PDRM and as promoted by the government instead.

It's time the government only allow formal gated communities (GC) in private (or strata) properties. No more informal "GC" schemes by RAs in all non-private property residences. Stop the disharmony and the disunity in all our neighborhoods.

----<<<>>>----

Regulation 7 of the Peraturan-Peraturan Pendaftaran Kebangsaan 1990 clearly states that security guards (or any persons) are not allowed to conduct checks on your identity, let alone request for any kind of identification documents.

Regulation 7 also explicitly states that only certain officers are allowed to inspect the identity of a person and request the person to produce his/her MyKad for inspection. These officers include:
  • registration officers (of the National Registration Department of Malaysia or JPN)
  • police officers (PDRM)
  • customs officers/ immigration officers
  • members of the Armed Forces on duty
  • public officers authorized by the Director General

Pengawal keselamatan yang bertugas di kediaman awam (termasuk di komuniti berpagar yang tidak formal) tidak dibenarkan untuk meminta dokumen identiti seperti MyKad ataupun lesen memandu daripada pihak awam. 

Tetapi pengawal keselamatan yang bertugas di premis persendirian (seperti di komuniti berpagar yang formal, kondominium dan bangunan swasta) dibenarkan untuk meminta dokumen identiti pelawat bagi tujuan rekod butiran.

Skim komuniti berpagar jenis "formal" dan jenis "tidak formal" adalah tidak sama. Pelaksanaan kedua-dua jenis skim komuniti ini harus dibezakan. Komuniti berpagar formal adalah skim yang lebih senang diurus kerana ia adalah sejenis skim perumahan swasta yang memiliki hakmilik stratanya sendiri.

Peruntukan Peraturan 7 Peraturan-Peraturan Pendaftaran Kebangsaan 1990 memperuntukkan bahawa hanya seorang pegawai pendaftaran, pegawai polis, pegawai kastam, pegawai tentera atau pegawai lain yang diberi kuasa bertulis oleh Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran sahaja yang dibenarkan untuk meminta dan memeriksa identiti seseorang dengan mengemukakan kad pengenalan.

"Syarikat Kawalan Keselamatan hanya boleh meminta dokumen identiti pelawat semata-mata bagi tujuan semakan dan rekod kemasukan ke premis persendirian dan kemudian mengembalikannya kepada pelawat selepas identiti mereka direkodkan."


----<<<>>>----

Kepada semua RA yang melaksanakan skim kawalan perumahan informal di Klang... sila rujuk kepada garis panduan MPK seperti tertera di bawah:

1). Tidak dibenarkan menghalang kenderaan keluar/masuk ke kawasan berkenaan.
2). Penghuni yang tidak menyertai skim ini tidak boleh dihalang sama sekali memasuki kediaman mereka pada bila-bila masa.
3). Penggunaan kad akses (automatic) dilarang sama sekali.

*Sumber: MPK (Terima kasih & Penghargaan kpd MPK!)

----<<<>>>----

"Both the GnG schemes must be differentiated as they are not the same..."

----<<<>>>----

Here is Another Reason Why We Don't Support "Informal GnG Schemes"...


Only Komuniti Rukun Tetangga (KRT) together with Skim Rondaan Sukarela (SRS) that are backed by PDRM, are genuine neighbourhood watch schemes endorsed by the Government of Malaysia. Do not fall prey to syndicates and unscrupulous RAs.

----<<<>>>----


----<<<>>>----

To The Communities of Bandar Bukit Raja, Klang Utara:

Please be informed that the implementation of automated proximity/ access card system by the RAs in BBR are unlawful and illegal as they do not have the proper approval from the council. In the first place the RAs here do not have enough consent from the residents.

Fyi, auto access/proximity card system can only be implemented in strata-titled properties or private residences. (It is only allowed in formal GC schemes - it is prohibited in all types of informal "GC" schemes or GN schemes).

This entire neighbourhood consisting of Sime Darby Property's double-storey link /terrace houses is a non-strata, non-private development. (To all RAs in BBR - these are just informal "GnG" schemes; or categorized as Guarded Neighbourhood (GN) schemes only - so please do not flout the laws to bully the communities).

Many residents are fuming over the RAs' selfish agenda, causing lots of grievances, disharmony and inconveniences to the communities.

If you are being stopped by “security guards” at the boom-gate from moving in and out, this is what you can do:
 
1. Tell them they have no right to ask for your MyKad or driving license (even just for checking and recording purposes, as it is illegal and an offence reportable to PDRM). Tell them it is illegal for them to block public roads in the first place. Tell them you will have to make a police report and lodge a complaint if they don't let you through.

2. Please make a police report at the nearest Balai Polis Bukit Raja Klang Utara (Tel: 03-3345 2222) if they do not comply. (You can try to request to speak with the RA chairman /committee, but take down their names and contact no. for/if any further actions).

3. And lodge in a public online complaint (e-aduan) to MPKlang or do it at the MPKlang counter there, better still if supported by a copy of your police report for prompt action. Or you can just lodge in a complaint to the council's e-aduan without a police report.

Automated Access Card System is already being prohibited by all the local councils (eg. MBSA, MBPJ, MPKlang) unless the Persatuan Penduduk (RA) has 100% consent from all the residents which they do not have. Not even close. So, do not be fooled by your RA into joining their informal GC schemes that are breaking the laws.

Monday, 15 February 2021

Can security guards ask for your MyKad / driving license?

So now the question is... can security guards check /ask for your MyKad or Driving License for identification (even just for recording purposes only)?

There is a lot of confusion when it comes to this "GnG" subject. This lack of clarity and knowledge by the communities have been used by unscrupulous RAs to bully its non-paying residents and the surrounding communities.

When we want to talk about this subject, we need to define first whether we are referring to a formal GC scheme or an informal "GC" scheme? They are both very different and shouldn't be mixed up.

Due to the lack of awareness by the public, the RAs have been taking advantage of this grey area to coerce residents to sign up/pay for their bogus schemes that are breaking the laws.

All "Informal Gated Community" schemes that are operated by Residents Associations (RA) in non-private housing areas are not legal gated communities at all. Actually, these so-called "GnG" schemes implemented by RAs are against the laws and guidelines.

Only "Formal Gated Community" schemes that are managed by Management Corporation (MC) or Joint Management Body (JMB) are legal GnG schemes protected and bound by the Strata Title Act 1985 and the Strata Management Act 2013.

Regulation 7 of the Peraturan-Peraturan Pendaftaran Kebangsaan 1990 clearly states that security guards (or any persons) are not allowed to conduct checks on your identity, let alone request for any kind of identification documents.

Regulation 7 also explicitly states that only certain officers are allowed to inspect the identity of a person and request the person to produce his/her MyKad for inspection. These officers include:
  • registration officers (of the National Registration Department of Malaysia or JPN)
  • police officers (PDRM)
  • customs officers/ immigration officers
  • members of the Armed Forces on duty
  • public officers authorized by the Director General

Security guards at an "informal gated community" do not have the right to ask visitors for MyKad or driving license. It is against the law and it is an offense.

Only licensed security guards on duty at a "formal gated community" or a stratified condominium have the right to ask visitors for MyKad or driving license for identification and recording purposes.


Pengawal keselamatan yang bertugas di kediaman awam (termasuk di komuniti berpagar yang tidak formal) tidak dibenarkan untuk meminta dokumen identiti seperti MyKad ataupun lesen memandu daripada pihak awam.

Tetapi pengawal keselamatan yang bertugas di premis persendirian (seperti di komuniti berpagar yang formal, kondominium dan bangunan swasta) dibenarkan untuk meminta dokumen identiti pelawat bagi tujuan rekod butiran.

Skim komuniti berpagar jenis "formal" dan jenis "tidak formal" adalah tidak sama. Pelaksanaan kedua-dua jenis skim komuniti ini harus dibezakan. Komuniti berpagar formal adalah skim yang lebih senang diurus kerana ia adalah sejenis skim perumahan swasta yang memiliki hakmilik stratanya sendiri.

Peruntukan Peraturan 7 Peraturan-Peraturan Pendaftaran Kebangsaan 1990 memperuntukkan bahawa hanya seorang pegawai pendaftaran, pegawai polis, pegawai kastam, pegawai tentera atau pegawai lain yang diberi kuasa bertulis oleh Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran sahaja yang dibenarkan untuk meminta dan memeriksa identiti seseorang dengan mengemukakan kad pengenalan.

"Syarikat Kawalan Keselamatan hanya boleh meminta dokumen identiti pelawat semata-mata bagi tujuan semakan dan rekod kemasukan ke premis persendirian dan kemudian mengembalikannya kepada pelawat selepas identiti mereka direkodkan."

http://www.moha.gov.my/images/maklumat_perkhidmatan/pekeliling_agensi_persendirian/pekeliling_4.pdf



Justeru, pengawal keselamatan hanya boleh meminta dokumen identiti pelawat yang hendak memasuki premis persendirian sahaja (seperti di kondominium dan komuniti berpagar yang formal sahaja). Pengawal keselamatan tidak dibenarkan meminta dokumen identiti di kediaman awam.


Secara ringkas, syarat-syaratnya adalah seperti berikut:


1) Pengawal keselamatan dibenarkan meminta dokumen identiti pelawat hanya di premis persendirian sahaja seperti di kondominium dan komuniti berpagar yang formal. (Ini tidak dibenarkan di kediaman awam seperti komuniti berpagar yang tidak formal).


2) Syarikat kawalan keselamatan mestilah berlesen dan berdaftar dengan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN - Lesen Agensi Persendirian)


3) Pengawal keselamatan mestilah memakai pakaian seragam dan lencana sah yang diluluskan KDN (Lampiran 1 di bawah Seksyen 3 Akta No. 27/71 - Pengambilan Pengawal dan Pekerja)


4) Pengawal keselamatan mesti mempunyai KPPK (kad pengenalan pengawal keselamatan) yang sah dan telah melalui program latihan CSG serta tapisan keselamatan KDN.


5) Menepati semua syarat seperti terkandung dalam Lesen Agensi Persendirian dan Seksyen 3 Akta No. 27/71 yang dikeluarkan oleh KDN.


-----<<<>>>-----

Back in 2007, a circular by the *Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA), addressed this issue, in regards to the guidelines for identification of visitors entering premises such as condominiums, residential areas, and fenced communities nationwide (that are under "private property"). *Btw, it is illegal to ask for identification of visitors entering "public property" including informal GnG(An informal GnG residence is not a "private property").

It was stated that only a registration officer, police officer, customs officer, military officer or other officers authorised by the National Registration Department (JPN) director-general, can conduct checks on the identity of a person and request for identification, in accordance with Rule 7 of the National Registration Regulation 1990.

Additionally, National Registration Act 1959 (Act 78) and the National Registration Regulations 1990 (Amendment 2007), under Regulation 8, states that only an authorised personnel may require visitors to show them their MyKad for identity verification. *(Fyi, a private security guard is not an authorised personnel from the government)

In fact, a person who unlawfully keeps another person's MyKad can be charged under Regulation 25 of the National Registration Act.

Despite it being completely illegal, some people still give in to these requests for sensitive, important documents such as MyKad

It is argued that it will be difficult to get things done if a visitor refuses to give a personal document as they will not be allowed to pass through the security check point and get to their desired destination.

Many others have voiced their objection to this practice, only to hear from the security personnel, saying that they are "only doing their job" and that there was no way to win the argument.

Eventually, people comply just because they "do not want any trouble" or to complicate things.

The practice of handing out an identification document to security guards is illegal and it poses the risk of forgery or misuse. For those who think that it's a good security measure, it is not. It is not foolproof as there were many cases whereby gangs and criminals use forged or stolen identity cards to target the GnG communities.

Licensed security guards on duty at "formal gated communities" have the right to ask visitors for identification. 

However, security guards at "informal gated communities" do not. In the first place they have no right to block anyone from access to any "public property" residences.


Recently, the residents associations (RAs) in Shah Alam are being subjected to the guidelines by the Shah Alam City Council (MBSA) for gated-and-guarded (G&G) scheme. The Star Online reported that the guidelines were amended to streamline the process and avoid confusion.

Here are some of the highlights of the new guidelines:

1. RAs must get consent from residents (100% approval) to set up automated gates and the access card system.

2. Security guards are not allowed to stop anyone from moving in or out of public residences.

3. Security guards are not allowed to ask for anyone's MyKad or even take a photograph of it at informal gated communities (public property or individual title residence).

4. Security guards on duty are allowed to record details of any visitor's MyKad or driving licence only at formal gated and guarded community (private property or strata residence).


A citizen residing in Petaling Jaya wrote in an open letter that was published on The Star, saying that other local city councils such as Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) should take heed and emulate MBSA's efforts in tackling this tricky issue.

The writer said that the current landscape and process at G&G housing areas has made it extremely tedious for non-residents to move around the surrounding neighbourhoods. (The roads do not belong to the RAs).

It was said that the new stipulations, aimed at establishing orderliness and greater security and convenience for residents and visitors, are welcomed in a step forward towards the development of the country.

"I am sure this may have annoyed some but there must be the rule of law and the MBSA puts it quite clearly what must be complied with."

"I ask those wanting their neighbourhood gated and guarded, how they would feel when they are being asked for their identity card or stopped when visiting another housing area?"

Source: says.com/lifestyle
Original article by: Tang Ruxyn

----<<<>>>----

(For example, some ethical RAs of informal 'GnG' residences in PJ only instruct their security guards to take down the vehicle's registration no - which is in accordance to MBPJ's guidelines). 

Ethical RAs will follow the guidelines and "the rule of law" but corrupt ones will not as they have their personal agenda. People who are not aware of their rights or the laws will be bullied.

AskLegal.my
by Denise C
https://asklegal.my/p/neighbourhood-security-guards-registration-block-roads-malaysia

Tuesday, 9 February 2021

Syarat ketat G&G yg dikenakan oleh Majlis Perbandaran /Bandaraya adalah tepat sekali

Skim komuniti berpagar jenis "formal" dan jenis "tidak formal" adalah tidak sama. Pelaksanaan kedua-dua jenis skim komuniti ini harus dibezakan. Komuniti berpagar formal adalah skim yang lebih senang diurus kerana ia adalah sejenis skim perumahan swasta yang memiliki hakmilik stratanya sendiri.

Disebabkan bukan ramai orang yang tahu sangat tentang perbezaan ini, pihak RA yang korup telah mengambil kesempatan untuk melaksanakan skim berpagar di kediaman awam yang menyalahi undang-undang.

Pelbagai kesalahan dilakukan seperti menghalang kenderaan, jalanraya awam dihalang, permintaan dokumen pengenalan seperti MyKad dan Lesen Memandu oleh pengawal keselamatan, penggunaan kad akses automatik yang dilarang dan sebagainya.

Akibatnya kesejahteraan, keharmonian dan perpaduan penduduk dan komuniti sekitar terjejas dengan teruk.

Walaupun kediaman yang dimaksudkan ini bukan jenis harta persendirian atau hakmilik strata, namun pelbagai skim kawalan tidak formal telah dilaksanakan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu, dan walaupun ianya merupakan skim tanpa sebarang unsur paksaan, ramai penduduk masih membayar untuk menyertai skim kawalan di kediaman mereka atas ketakutan dan sebab-sebab tertentu yang lain. Dan walaupun mereka membantah, mereka tidak berani mengeluarkan suara.

Ini semua telah menimbulkan perbalahan dan sengketa di kalangan penduduk dan komuniti. Nampaknya ada pihak-pihak tertentu yang tidak hiraukan undang-undang sediada. Jadi, apa telah terjadi kepada "Rukun Negara - Kedaulatan Undang-Undang?"

Kita sebagai rakyat prihatin yang sayangkan negara ingin menyeru kepada kerajaan terutamanya kepada pihak berkuasa di Selangor supaya mengambil tindakan ke atas skim-skim berpagar yang "tidak formal" terutamanya di daerah Klang dan Setia Alam yang tidak mengikuti syarat, garis panduan dan menyalahi undang-undang.

Masalah ini telah berlarutan kian lama dan pihak berkuasa yang berkaitan sepatutnya lebih prihatin dalam menjaga kebajikan dan kepentingan rakyat jelata secara umum, bukan kepentingan golongan tertentu. Hak semua warganegara harus dipelihara.

Komuniti di taman-taman perumahan (rumah teres 2 tingkat) di sekitar Selangor telah di belenggu oleh wabak GnG haram yang berleluasa dan penduduk sekarang sedang mengeluh menghadapi pelbagai masalah seperti halangan jalanraya awam, menghalang kenderaan daripada keluar masuk, penggunaan sistem kad akses automatik yang tidak dibenarkan, kesalahan daripada permintaan MyKad atau lesen memandu oleh pengawal keselamatan, pengambilan pengawal keselamatan yang tidak berlesen untuk bertugas dan sebagainya.

Skim berpagar yang formal atau sahih patut hanya dibenarkan di kediaman swasta atau strata yang eksklusif sahaja, bukan di taman-taman perumahan umum di bawah PBT.

Cadangan kita ialah hanya skim Kawasan Rukun Tetangga (KRT) dan Skim Rondaan Sukarela (SRS) dibenarkan di taman-taman perumahan di bawah PBT seperti yang dipromosikan semula oleh pihak kerajaan pusat baru-baru ini. 

Kita kena wujudkan amalan-amalan nilai-nilai murni di kalangan masyarakat seluruh Malaysia untuk perpaduan nasional menerusi kedaulatan undang-undang Rukun Negara. Ini juga merupakan aspirasi, pelan dan dasar perpaduan negara 2021 -2030.

Syarat ketat yang dikenakan ke atas skim komuniti berpagar yang tidak formal oleh semua majlis bandaraya /perbandaran di Selangor seperti MBSA, MBPJ, MPK dan MPS adalah tepat sekali dan patut dipuji. Ada sebabnya mengapa semua majlis perbandaran /bandaraya di Selangor telah membuat keputusan ini. Ia dibuat setelah mengambil kira semua faktor termasuk pendapat komuniti secara keseluruhan dan bukannya hanya daripada golongan tertentu sahaja.

Sebagai pihak berkuasa yang bertanggungjawab dan prihatin, dan setelah kajian secara mendalam telah dibuat, pihak majlis telah memutuskan perkara ini. Pujian harus diberi kepada semua pihak majlis tersebut kerana dapat membuat keputusan yang tepat, adil dan berkepentingan komuniti secara holistik. 

Perpaduan masyarakat juga diberi penekanan selain daripada melindungi hak semua penduduk dan komuniti. Keputusan ini juga telah dibuat bagi mencegah golongan tertentu atau pihak yang korup daripada mengambil kesempatan atas nama keselamatan komuniti.

Harus diingat bahawa skim komuniti berpagar tidak formal ini BUKAN suatu 'G&G' yang mempunyai kelulusan rasmi. Ia hanya wujud sekadar skim tanpa paksaan selagi ia tidak menimbulkan masalah kepada komuniti atau sengketa diantara penduduk.

Pengawal keselamatan di semua kediaman (bukan-persendirian) tidak dibenarkan menghalang kenderaan keluar masuk dan mereka tidak dibenarkan meminta dokumen pengenalan orang awam. Sistem kad akses juga tidak dibenarkan kecuali di kediaman atau premis persendirian sahaja. *(Sila rujuk kpd Garis Panduan Majlis dan Pekeliling drp KDN). Sekian, terimakasih.

Rukun Tetangga dan Rukun Negara ke arah
Keluarga Malaysia, Malaysia Prihatin





----<<<>>>----

PBT SELANGOR
February 4, 2018 2:05 pm
OLEH SYAZWANI SUFIAN
Selangorkini

SHAH ALAM, 4 FEB: Sebanyak 30 taman perumahan melaksanakan sistem kawalan berpagar tanpa kebenaran Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya(MPAJ).

Yang Dipertuannya, Abd Hamid Hussain berkata, hanya 20 daripada 50 taman perumahan sahaja sudah mendapatkan kelulusan manakala selebihnya dilaksanakan secara haram.

“Memang kita menerima banyak permohonan daripada persatuan penduduk untuk mewujudkan sistem kawalan secara berpagar dan berpengawal, namun permohonan mereka tidak diluluskan kerana tidak menepati syarat ditetapkan."

“Mengikut garis panduan oleh Kementerian Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan (KPKT) dan Lembaga Perumahan dan Hartanah, semua penduduk perlu bersetuju untuk mewujudkan sistem itu,” katanya dalam sidang media selepas mesyuarat MPAJ baru-baru ini.

Hamid berkata, untuk mewujudkan sistem kawalan tersebut, pembangunan perumahan perlu mempunyai kawasan seluas lebih daripada tiga ekar.

“Ia adalah piawaian yang telah ditetapkan KPKT."

“Jika pembangunan perumahan seluas satu ekar mahu mewujudkan sistem itu, mereka perlu membayar yuran yang mahal kerana jumlah rumah yang sikit,” katanya.

Tambah Hamid lagi, pelaksanaan sistem itu juga perlu mengambil kira banyak faktor lain antaranya tidak menghalang perjalanan penduduk di kawasan lain kerana terdapat juga beberapa perumahan yang jalannya dikongsi.

Selain itu, untuk melaksanakan sistem tutup laluan (boom gates) ke perumahan, mereka hanya boleh tutup dari jam 12 malam hingga 6 pagi sahaja.

Popular Posts

Pages